Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep Will ^(talk) 15:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Shit

Shit (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I think we should delete this. Grounded into a double play (talk) 12:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

• Wikipedia is not censored, you may consider an article to be vulgar[1] but it is not a reason to delete the article. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 12:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy keep and close Bad-faith nomination. Lugnuts (talk) 13:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy keep and close per above. Redfarmer (talk) 13:29, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy keep and close This seems like an obvious bad-faith nomination to me. "We should delete this" does not a nomination reason make. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 14:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep/merge It should be turned into a disambiguation page as there are at least four different meanings - excrement, exclamation, drugs and metaphor. The current content is too dictionary-like - all about etymology and usage. Colonel Warden (talk) 14:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.