Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shireen M. Mazari
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus keep. Marskell 17:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Shireen M. Mazari
No sources, notability not established. Delete. Jefferson Anderson 18:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 19:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- DO NOT DELETE. Notability established. Sources given.
- delete I don't think this passes WP:PROF, and I see no evidence of any notable impact beyond academia. Pete.Hurd 21:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete the article is an apparent copyvio from the references given. But she might be notable--If the article is rewritten in a proper way, it would help to have a list of her publications. This is not included in the references provided: [1] says it is "available on demand" It is difficult to evaluate academic people who do not have a current list of their publications online. DGG 02:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- delete doesn't seem to be notable.--Sefringle 05:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Tentative Keep. Notably, she is cited as a highly respected expert in this Frontline article. Frontline ([2]) is a sister publication of The Hindu. Stammer 05:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- keep Notable expert that has been cited.--Kirby♥time 05:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Again, absent significant sources to the contrary, this person really just doesn't yet seem notable enough for a dedicated encyclopedic entry. Lemonsawdust 07:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- weak keep per outside sourcing the_undertow talk 08:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete The sources furnished do not show that she satisfies WP:PROF, but some references might exist somewhere to strengthn her claim to notability. Did she publish more than the one book? Did she have a major influence in her field? Did she win awards for her research and teaching? Did she have notable students who were positively affected by her teaching? Does she serve on panels and boards in her discipline and edit journals? Edison 14:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep: She has 1400 G-hits on the Pakistani Google [3], and those include a bunch of solid, serious news hits. (Although I must admit her interview on Larry Flynt's website is one I skipped). RGTraynor 14:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Director General of Institute of Strategic Studies, gets some good hits on news search [4]. Reports like this portrays Mazari's importance and notability. --Dwaipayan (talk) 16:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral it's hard to establish notability, but my fellow Wikipedians do bring up a good point of in Pakistan she may be much more notable. Jmlk17 19:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- DON'T DELETE. She is the author of Kargil War: Separating Facts from Fiction (1999), and I think that is enough to prove notability. So, a message saying that the article needs to be improved should be enough. Other than that, she is the director of ISSI, which I believe is the only civilian think tank in Pakistan. Razzsic 04:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
