This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep.FCYTravis 5 July 2005 09:49 (UTC)
This isn't so much a Vote for Deletion as a request for euthanasia. This article serves no purpose, it has no context, if anyone wants to keep it they should clean it up themselves. Physchim62 13:07, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Keep and expand. Seems to be a genuine political party with some historic significance. See [1] for instance. Pburka 13:52, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete almost speedy with its lack of content. JamesBurns 06:14, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Keep and expand. Notable. —Seselwa 20:50, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Keep and expand. Improper vfd nomination. ~leif ☺ (talk) 20:59, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.