Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shipwreck'd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 00:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shipwreck'd

Shipwreck'd (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

future album that presents no reliable sources Will ^(talk) 17:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep WP:CRYSTAL doesn't mention albums... but it does specifically allow for inclusion of notable and likely to occur future events. Nominator gives no reason to suspect these albums won't be released so, at most, they should be redirected to the notable band releasing the album, not deleted. Redirection doesn't require AFD. --W.marsh 18:29, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per the nomination. Where are the reliable third party publications about this subject? I see NO SOURCES presented. Burntsauce 17:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bainer (talk) 10:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete This information is not sourced. Neozoon 22:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Majoreditor 02:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The debut album was going to be self titled, now it is untitled, yet the article is titled Shipwreck'd. This is why policy requires reliable sources and the absence of such is why this is a delete. Nuttah68 18:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.