Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinook Nohara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shinook Nohara

Shinook Nohara (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Why do you live in Valetta? (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

plus redirects

This appears to be a hoax. There are no search results (expect for the Wikipedia article) for Shinook Nohara, 野原 しヌーク, or Why do you live in Valetta?. Also nominating the related article Why do you live in Valetta?. Leebo ^T/C 13:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Delete: as definite hoax. The article asserts that this purported diplomat working as an ambassadorial-grade Japanese envoy was fired in 2004 and went right into the executive of the Boston engineering contractors working the Big Dig tunnels. Beyond that, it incorrectly describes her non-descript boyfriend as CEO of Teradyne.  RGTraynor  13:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Can't find anything about this person. Blaise Joshua 14:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy; the books dont appear in worldcat.org. John Vandenberg 15:12, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

• There's no speedy criterion for hoaxes. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 17:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete, obvious hoax, with search results totalling one goose egg. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 17:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Hoaxes both. -- RHaworth 18:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. — Wenli ^(contribs) 20:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete both as hoaxes. Kevin 21:49, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Neier 05:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.