Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinigan Down

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted as silly vandalism. Capitalistroadster 02:14, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shinigan Down

Mayodan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) created the article and it appears to be a completely unverifiable hoax. (ESkog)(Talk) 00:06, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. No google hits. Feezo (Talk) 00:10, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. The author appears to be obsessed with it. Royboycrashfan 00:10, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and unblank this page (which someone, probably the creator, had blanked). —Cuiviénen, Wednesday, 5 April 2006 @ 00:11 (UTC)
  • Delete pn, the so called cable channel returns no google hits T K E 00:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I'm calling WP:SNOW on this one. Yes, a show that aired for the better part of a decade is so obscure, that no one can find anything about it. Why people waste time with hoax articles, I don't know. --Kinu t/c 00:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC); amended 00:55, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Sometimes, they're funny! T K E 00:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • This one is not. Royboycrashfan 00:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • That's for sure. T K E 01:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. Why should this drivel keep hanging around? (I couldn't find blanking in the page history, but it would seem a good idea.) LambiamTalk 00:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
I see, the AfD page had been blanked. Look at the user's contributions, clearly a troll (Mary K. Sponze?) LambiamTalk 00:39, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as vandalism. User's other edits are also vandalism, such as pasting the article over legitimate articles such as Aussie. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete per Starblind, especially considering this was used to vandalize regular articles. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:45, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Tobyk777 00:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. Do I need to point out that any article containing the phrase "liberal media assholes" in the first sentence will, with probability one, qualify for a speedy? --Deville (Talk) 00:53, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • speedy delete Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:09, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete this obvious nonsense. --Calton | Talk 00:57, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.