Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shine honesty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Canley (talk) 02:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Shine honesty
Not particularly notable as far as I can tell and is little more than a tracklisting, which is discouraged by WP:MUSIC. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- comment - good luck with that. The fact is that almost no album deletion AfD ever succeeds, regardless of what WP:MUSIC says. (And when the AfD is closed, somebody needs to move the article to Shine Honesty with the capital 'H'.) --Orange Mike | Talk 16:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - per WP:MUSIC. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I added a link to a dallas observer review and cleaned the article up a bit including links to wiki pages for the record label etc. agreed that the article should be titled with capital H Joe Wallace (talk) 05:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Joe, I've asked on your talk page but not had a reply, so I'll ask again here: are you related to or friends with User:Cameron McCasland? You seem only to edit articles that mention him as a subject, as this one does. I'm worried that there may be a conflict of interest. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about that I must have missed it. While I have met Cameron I would not say I know him. In the same way I have met president bush, roger clemens, etc. He is a member of several other boards including the Rondo Hatton original site. Again sorry for the tardiness of my reply. Joe Wallace (talk) 01:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - studio albums are usually considered notable if the band is/was notable. Bearian (talk) 22:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont (talk) 09:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.