Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheldon Independent School District

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 00:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sheldon Independent School District

notability, necessity of article in Wikipedia Guroadrunner 00:37, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep seems to be a reasonable article, covers a local governmental body. Don't see how you can question that notability. Necessity isn't a grounds for deletion, I would say most people find the vast majority of Wikipedia articles not necessary to them. FrozenPurpleCube 02:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. There's nothing wrong with the article, and the district seems to have some degree of notability. --Nevhood 03:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep agree completely with two keeps above.Balloonman 04:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Articles on school districts are a much better alternative to having a ton of articles of non-notable schools. Resolute 05:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, being a district government body makes something notable enough, in my opinion. The article is well written and contains all relevant information and is sourced, it just possibly needs some details added and be slightly updated for 2007. Poeloq 10:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Wikify the article and create the links to feeder schools and then it would be OK. It complys with WP:SCHOOL.Tellyaddict 15:37, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep I thought Primary and Nursery School information was supposed to be merged into the school district article. Would be kinda difficult if it had been deleted. Jcuk 16:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Per above arguments. - Denny 17:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Looks very reasonable and Quite notable..--Cometstyles 18:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Noroton 19:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per Jcuk, Resolute and Poeloq arguments above. Noroton 19:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep It is notable enough and is a good enough article to keep. Captain panda In vino veritas 22:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, especially on the basis that this sort of article serves as a practical solution to many N dilemmas involving schools; they can each get a section and redirect. It is the sort of compromise that WP needs. DGG 00:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep notable enough. Ezratrumpet 00:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - COULD SOMEONE HELP WIKIFY IT? Guroadrunner 06:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC) shouts
• Keep School district is notable considering the amount of people served by a district. --Masterpedia 20:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.