Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheepish Productions

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk 15:14, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sheepish Productions

Probably vanity, fails Google test (zero hits). [1] --Alan Au 07:43, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Does not seem notable. I think it's a high school group: "departure of the creators from Alfred Deakin High School" Kushboy 07:47, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
• I smell vanity. Google-free vanity. Delete. - Lucky 6.9 07:52, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
• I could not find this group on Google, but have seen some of their work in film festivals and thought I would try Wikipedia...very impressed it was on here... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.26.16.66 (talk • contribs) 2005-08-06 13:35:53 UTC
  • A user had removed this and replaced it with his/her own text. Keep an eye on this. Kushboy 14:06, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
    • I've merged in the text that 203.26.16.66 (talk · contribs) added. Uncle G 23:16:21, 2005-08-06 (UTC)
• Delete nn vanity. --Etacar11 04:26, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I am a huge Sheepish Productions fan having seen their work in Sydney film festival. --SimonWoolford 05:54, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • User only has 4 edits, 2 of them here. --Etacar11 14:00, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• It reads like a company flyer. Delete. If the original editors can come up with a strong article describing the company, its financial, social or cultural importance, and reference it responsibily, that'll be fine. As it stands it's an ad.→Encephalon | ζ | ∑ 13:06:35, 2005-08-07 (UTC)
• Come back in a few years, boys. Delete.DS 15:19, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
• A film-festival company is noteworthy, even if they aren't internet promoted. Keep ClintonShifcofske 18:03, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
  • User's only edits are to this page. --Etacar11 14:44, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

• I can't find any proof that they really were in a film festival. The unsigned comment is fishy because the article is very new and it would be highly coincidental that someone searched for it on Wikipedia during its time on here. Also, an update: their website now has pictures of them and of the night of their formal. They seem very young.~~ (Unsigned comment by Kushboy (talk · contribs))

• I do think this page needs work and more information. If this can be provided - Keep (Raiders 08:08, 8 August 2005 (UTC))
  • User's first edit. --Etacar11 14:44, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Sockpuppet alert! Can I vote again to delete? Pleeeeese? - Lucky 6.9 05:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Slightly more information needed. However, an Australian film festival group is worthy enough for an article. Keep. (The Horse 12:24, 9 August 2005 (UTC))
• Delete as per nominator.--nixie 03:14, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Definitely KEEP. Rising Australian film production companies need to be supported. Deleting this article is deleting the hard work of someone out there. You people ought to be ashamed of yourselves. (220.245.212.75 11:50, 11 August 2005 (UTC))
  • User's only edit. --Etacar11 14:00, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
    • I think Etacar11 has something against this article. (The Horse 04:11, 15 August 2005 (UTC))
      • No, just sockpuppets. --Etacar11 04:15, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete--Cyberjunkie | Talk 06:21, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.