Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shayna Richardson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 14:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shayna Richardson

Was in the media breifly in 2005, no encyclopedic value, delete--nixie 05:30, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• Weak keep She is a minor celebrity and it is notable. Ouch! -- MicahMN | μ 07:52, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• We went through this already with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shayna Robertson, at which time it was pointed out that the subject's name was actually Shayna Richardson, but the consensus was to delete rather than move the article. Google News now finds only 184 references to her, and only two since Dec. 16 [1] which suggests that her story is not a subject of ongoing interest, just a transitory human interest story. Delete per WP:BIO. --Metropolitan90 08:11, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• I find 330 hits for her on google..... Anyhow I think her story is notable, so Keep Jcuk 11:10, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Crufty to the extreme, but varafiable by fox news and other sources - plus it is fairly decent and much improved over last time - so Keep WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 11:44, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vote was unanimous the last time. Still non-notable. Durova 18:57, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep This story may develop more depending on the health of her child, or if sanctions are brought against her or her boyfriend for improper conduct (he was her instructor). This situation isn't dead yet. Jaileer 20:39, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep For media coverage and medical significance. Trilemma 21:46, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.