Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawshank pee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shawshank pee

• Unverifiable neologism, no google hits. Delete. Fightindaman 00:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Term is in widespread use in Southwestern Ontario. Leave it in. Enots1
• Delete. Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. Hynca-Hooley 00:31, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Wikipedia contains many articles concerning things that don't appear in proper dictionaries or encyclopedias. This term is used substantially in Southern Ontario. Enots1
  • Enots1 has fewer than 20 edits - of which 13 are to the article being deleted here. BD2412 T 00:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Please only vote once. Thank you. Fightindaman 00:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. BD2412 T 01:18, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom -- Aim Here 01:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable, non-verifiable. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 01:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: per above. --Hetar 01:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Death Eater Dan (Muahaha) 01:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• I apologize. I was not aware that this was a page for voting. My second bullet was meant to be a response to the "Wikipedia is not an Urban Dictionary" point against my article, not a "vote". Enots1
• Delete. --Khoikhoi 03:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as an unverifiable neologism. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Yep, currently unverifiable. ProhibitOnions 05:31, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I hate to pile on, but, geez .. Cyde Weys 04:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, piling on. Wheee. I don't mean to be flippant, but since you're asking for advice on how to improve the article: I'm not sure you can. It's a made up term, that does not appear to be in use outside of a small group of friends; a neologism, and not a wide spread one. Kuru ^talk 04:49, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Perhaps some advice could be given to help me make the article acceptable rather than simply voting "no". Enots1
  • Comment: At the very least it needs to be verifiable. That is, you need to find a reputable source that can back up what the article says. Fightindaman 05:19, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I live in Southwestern Ontario, am in my early twenties and have NEVER heard of this before. Mike _{(T C)} 05:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I think it's a funny term though. For what it's worth, I live in Toronto and I'm in my twenties, and I've never heard of it either. Enots1, I think we're asking for some sort of a reference that backs up the term being used generally. Don't be discouraged, and please contribute more to the encyclopedia. -- Samir ∙ ^T_C 07:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:26, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unverifiable dicdef, and Wikipedia is not urbandictionary.com. Robin Johnson 15:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is a protologism that cries itself to sleep at night wishing it could one way grow up to become a neologism. --Aaron 20:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism. Plus the article is just about the name, it doesn't even explain how to do it successfully. Peter Grey 04:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. In 30+ years of living in SW Ontario, in 6 different communities, I have never heard this.Nimby 16:56, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.