Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawnee Mission East I.B.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 08:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Shawnee Mission East I.B.

Vanity page for several students in the International Baccalaureate program at a high school in the Kansas City area. As this does not differ from the IB program anywhere else in the world, I don't see this ever becoming a reasonable article, so I have put it here instead of cleanup. ESkog 15:11, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - nn CLW 15:29, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

September 30th was an exceptionally busy AfD day. So this debate among several got almost no attention. Relisting in hope of some tender, loving debate this time around. -Splash^talk 00:00, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete IBassassinatin'. That's cute. But clearly vanity and non-encyclopedic. Justin Bacon 00:16, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per all of the above. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:32, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete If this H.S. has an article, move this content there. --Rogerd 01:52, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete More suitable for a blog. Brisvegas 04:18, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or Userfy if the creator wants it (the creater does have an account). This is probably not appropriate in its current state. However, if the author would like to add something encyclopedic to Shawnee Mission School District about the program, that would be great! --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 04:49, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete It doesn't make much sense to lump the schools together in a district article, but have a separate article for a single (non-unique) program in the HS. Plus, the content is mainly just personal experiences, which are not of interest to others, but more importantly, not verifiable by others. --rob 05:21, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.