Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Cobb

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 05:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Shawn Cobb

Vanity Page Leithp 12:09, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

• Ugh, awful. Delete. David | Talk 12:10, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- Vanity - Longhair | Talk 12:11, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Obvious vanity. --ElfWord 12:13, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• speedy --MarSch 12:42, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • This unfortunately isn't a candidate for speedy by my understanding of the criteria, otherwise I would have listed it as such. Leithp 13:19, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
    • it should be a candidate for speedy --MarSch 14:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • No argument here, from the looks of things User:216.20.25.1 has been creating vanity/nonsense articles and vandalising others all day. Tiresome. Leithp 15:45, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
        • Delete: It could be considered a nonsense speedy. Can somebody go to vandalism_in_progress and report this anon IP? jglc | t | c 16:13, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I think he's gotten bored and gone off to sniff glue or something. Leithp 17:08, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete kid vanity. But refreshing. --Etacar11 17:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• As much as I hate to rid us of an article about a great man of high "standarts", delete. --Scimitar 19:16, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. JamesBurns 05:52, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.