Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Carpenter

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. The nominator has changed to allow a keep (there being no other support for a merge). Also, the TIME article appears to have only been pointed out after the first two deletes. Thus, the suggestion of nonsense doesn't hold and the question of national secrecy is answered (but wouldn't be a reason anyway — meeting WP:V means it can't possibly be secret). Finally, the first nn vote was cast before the TIME link provided and seems not to have been revisited. -Splash 01:15, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Shawn Carpenter

Non-notable, information cannot be verified. Rschen7754 00:04, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nn DV8 2XL 00:23, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Either nn/nonsense or a very important intelligence agent whose cover could be blown by retaining this article. -Demogorgon's Soup-taster 08:55, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Can be verified in the same TIME article cited in Titan Rain that your browser apparently can't view. [1] Was notable enough for a full article in TIME; probably notable enough for Wikipedia. --Fastfission 19:33, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Fastfission. Crypticfirefly 05:36, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
• Okay... maybe this VFD was bad too... my apologies. I'd say either merge with Titan Rain or keep it as is... --Rschen7754 05:42, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.