Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaw History

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Has been Deleted per WP:CSD#A7. Chetblong^{T C} 03:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Shaw History

Shaw History (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Does not appear to be notable per WP:ORG. Has appear to have done several notable things, but they are difficult to find references for. Please list them if you can find some. Gary King (talk) 17:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete + salt - doesn't appear to be sufficiently notable for inclusion. Addhoc (talk) 18:56, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete and Salt - Should have been deleted per A7 (and has been, and re-created); author and IPs keep removing deletion notices, including this AfD. Dethme0w (talk) 19:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Yep, I've speedied this twice, so salting is a good idea. Addhoc (talk) 19:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

• "Save the clock tower! Save the clock tower." Except this one is, about saving a local cemetery. "Here's a quarter lady." Delete and salt, as stated above. Mandsford (talk) 22:04, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
• Comment: add related article. Wettershaw Manor is connected with this, including being edited by same the anon editor. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 22:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: added AFD tag to Wettershaw Manor. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Wettershaw Manor is supported by an article from the Columbia Missourian and may prove to be notable. I would recommend a separate AfD for that article. --Eastmain (talk) 02:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
      • Comment - that source is pretty thin gruel and seems to be a promotional piece that depends on what the author was told by the owner. Bridgeplayer (talk) 02:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete and Salt. Probably the same editor that created the similarly unencyclopedic Two-Mile Prairie and The History of Shaw. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. If a community group was able to force the Missouri state government to change the routing of a proposed highway, it probably got written about enough by reliable and independent sources to prove its notability. --Eastmain (talk) 02:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 02:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete both - the content fails WP:V and needs much better sourcing to survive. Bridgeplayer (talk) 02:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note. See WP:ANI#elaborate scam.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.