Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shasha bread Co.Inc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Wikiacc (talk) 20:08, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Shasha bread Co.Inc
Appears to be a minor bakery. NSR (talk) 23:58, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Userfy if he tones down the badvertismentisms. Otherwise, Delete. Karmafist 00:51, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Advert. Alr 01:00, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete this ad.--FloNight 01:39, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not for advertising every corner shop that wants free webspace. -Splashtalk 01:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Gator1 02:11, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Delete. Advertisement. *drew 05:50, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - nn vanity CLW 09:36, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete WP misused as free webspace. FMB 15:24, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. NN vanity advertisement. - Sensor 16:32, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as part of the fight against deletionist vandalism. Kurt Weber 19:05, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Deleting things isn't vandalism and it is, frankly, laughable to suggest that it is. -Splashtalk 19:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, it is vandalism, policy and popular perception to the contrary notwithstanding. Kurt Weber 19:14, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comments like the above are sadly not laughable, they are wholly unnacceptable and contrary to WP. Oh and Delete Dottore So 21:32, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- If you object to the policy, the appropriate response is to debate whether the policy should be changed, in the appropriate venues for such a discussion (i.e. the policy talk pages). It is not to simply act as if the policy doesn't exist. For that matter, this is copied and pasted directly off the company's own website, which raises copyvio issues. Delete. Bearcat 17:09, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Response to Kurt's comment here. Let's move on. Karmafist 17:28, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Ridiculous. - Sensor 21:25, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, it is vandalism, policy and popular perception to the contrary notwithstanding. Kurt Weber 19:14, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Deleting things isn't vandalism and it is, frankly, laughable to suggest that it is. -Splashtalk 19:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Somehow it does not seem to meet any criteria in WP:CORP. Vegaswikian 05:42, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.