Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharting
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. DS 20:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sharting and Shart
"Shart" has been deleted 3 times already --awh (Talk) 03:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- Note to closing admin: Both of these articles should be protected from recreation in the event that this is deleted. Pepsidrinka 16:38, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete As per nom. Wouldn't this qualify for a speedy? Darquis 04:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Soft redirectto Wiktionary entry. If it's deleted, it will likely get recreated again and again. dbtfztalk 04:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)- It appears there is no Wiktionary entry (there should be, I think, but I'm too lazy to create it right now). But that's OK, we should still make it a soft redirect to indicate that Wiktionary is a more appropriate place to search for this term. dbtfztalk 05:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to Along Came Polly. That makes the most sense, come to think of it. This article is really about a well-known part of that movie. dbtfztalk 06:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- It appears there is no Wiktionary entry (there should be, I think, but I'm too lazy to create it right now). But that's OK, we should still make it a soft redirect to indicate that Wiktionary is a more appropriate place to search for this term. dbtfztalk 05:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete been deleted 8 times at Shart and once at Sharting. This was a fake word used in one movie. It's never caught on. There has been no wiktionary entry because there's no such word. I have placed a CSD tag on the article, only to have it removed
w/o explanationsee my talk for explanation. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 05:29, 30 April 2006 (UTC)- It was explained to me by the admin who declined G4 that this version is vastly superior to the previous nine. Nevertheless, I remain convinced that this neologism has never entered common use. My vote is unchanged. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 05:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, surely - Richardcavell 06:42, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete- per the other eight speedies, and this one being obviously speediable as well. Reyk YO! 06:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as repost, marked as such. And salt the earth at both shart and sharting. Kimchi.sg 08:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to Along Came Polly. Ewlyahoocom 11:51, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as recreation of previously deleted material, and protect pages to prevent further recreation. --Metropolitan90 16:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Looking at the previous versions, I don't think this qualifies as a speedy deletion under G4. However, I agree with CrazyRussian that has never entered common use and thus, should be deleted. Pepsidrinka 16:33, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as repost. --DV8 2XL 19:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.