Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Mae Disney

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (no consensus), could perhaps be merged with Disney family, but no strong consensus on that either. I will let the article stay as it is for now, but if someone wants to merge it somewhere, go ahead and do it. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:23, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sharon Mae Disney

Non-notable relative of a famous person, attack page. Zoe 05:43, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete for reasons stated above. Gamaliel 05:44, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but only after a major POV-ectomy and general tune-up. Sharon Disney was one of the reasons Walt Disney created Disneyland in the first place...and I heard her surviving sister Diane address the crowd at the fiftieth anniversary celebration last month and she made reference to Sharon. Might take a whack at this m'self. - Lucky 6.9 05:51, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete but mention any influence she had in Walt Disney. Relatives of note-worthy people are not inherently notable. --Tysto 06:35, 2005 August 24 (UTC)
• keep please it can be cleaned up without being deleted Yuckfoo 06:42, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per zoe, tysto. Content can be included on Walt Disney. Dottore So 06:47, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Lucky 6.9. --Apyule 07:55, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but cleanup. Walt Disney is already legnthy as it is, and I'm sure Sharon is the only Disney relative who didn't have her own article until now. --FuriousFreddy 10:50, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
  • See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Kepple Disney, Disney family, and the family tree of Arundel Elias Disney at Wikitree. Uncle G 12:15:41, 2005-08-24 (UTC)
    • Well, the only memeber of Disney's immediate family, then. Well, redirect to Disney family and make a mention at Walt Disney that she was adopted because Walt and Lillian Disney had trouble concieving kids (they planned on having far more children than just Diane). --FuriousFreddy 14:07, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete NN, POV, and poorly written. I could overlook the poor writing and recommend a rewrite, but there is no reason she merits her own page.--Isotope23 14:12, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unless someone can WP:CITE credible souces for the material herein. Hall Monitor 17:43, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Disney family, merging only the content which can be independently verified. Hall Monitor 20:34, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into Walt Disney (a redirect would do no harm). Not individually encyclopedicalyl notable. -- BD2412 ^talk 18:00, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into Walt Disney as per BD. Fernando Rizo T/C 18:53, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep—it could be cleaned up and/or merged into Walt Disney. Journalist (talk · contribs)

• Delete per Dottore So. --PhilipO 20:01, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep or redirect to Disney Family or somesuch Trollderella 21:17, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, attack page. Nandesuka 13:05, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, I've cleaned up. -- user:zanimum

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.