Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon L. Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 04:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shannon L. Jones

ATTENTION! If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

Shannon L. Jones (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non-notable sports person, no references. Dan027 07:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete It comes close to CSD G1, patent nonsense. The claims about the person are unsourced and hard to believe; and the external links seem totally unrelated. Shalom ^Hello 08:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete This subject is definitely non notable and unsourced. There are no references relating to the subject him/herself. It may be a fabrication.--Stormbay 17:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete probable hoax. The external links, such as they are, point to general websites that don't mention the subject at all. Googling "Shannon L. Jones" softball returns this article. Googling "Shannon L. Jones" The Girth returns nothing.--Sethacus 20:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete not sourced ,not notable Harlowraman 20:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete Utterly non-notable, borders on an A1 speedy (no context). A look at the article history reveals that there's some pretty serious sockpuppetry/meatpuppetry going on.Blueboy96 20:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no notability established. Nuttah68 11:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per the nomination. It might be a hoax but either way it lacks reliable sources. Yamaguchi先生 01:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.