Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shalini Sehkar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:55, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Shalini Sehkar
No notability, probably advertising. Justinfr (talk) 22:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of secondary sources to show notability. Kevin (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. No assertion of notability, fails WP:BLP miserably due to lack of RS. JGHowes talk - 02:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
I removed the quotes from the subject's blog that was previously considered advertising, and I rewrote the whole article. That was why I removed the tag.
Sorry if that counts as vandalism.
--hbbtk —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hbbtk (talk • contribs) 18:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, that's understandable, though the notability tag also was removed and, as of yet, no editor has made a case for why the article's subject is notable, as per WP:BLP or WP:NOTE. Justinfr (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Google brings up various secondary sources. ---hbbtk
- Do not delete. ---As hbbtk says, Google brings up secondary sources, notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.2.116.29 (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- I've glanced through the first four pages of google results and only see blog entries, online profiles, etc., not reliable sources. The only exception I could find is an online newsletter from CMU. If you would please provide specific links it would be helpful because I remain unconvinced. Justinfr (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Do not delete There is an article from the Center for Inquiry about the subject, some discussion at Telic Thoughts, and Google notability is a lot higher than some of the other subjects in the category 'Science Bloggers'. I would say do not delete. ----hbbtk
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
