Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaheed Mir Murtaza Abro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Shaheed Mir Murtaza Abro

Shaheed Mir Murtaza Abro (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Unsourced, google hasn't heard of him. Anon editors remove any requests for references without comment. Weregerbil (talk) 08:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment Leaning towards delete but I'll wait for a comment from WikiProject Pakistan. I think he's related to a candidate for parliament [1] (the address includes his father's name), but that's all I can find in English. "Murtaza Abro" doesn't seem to get any GHits written in Arabic alphabet either; actually I don't really know how to spell "Abro" but I tried with both regular old "R" and the South Asian retroflex "R" (ڑ), neither of them get any GHits: Find sources: مرتضى ابڑو — news, books, scholar, Find sources: مرتضى ابرو — news, books, scholar). cab (talk) 09:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 09:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp (talk) 14:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. I looked up the history log for this article which was created on March 31, 2008. As the nomination says, the creator of the article keeps removing the reference and notability tags with no explanations and no sources added. Nothing in Google[2]. No sources to prove notability or even existence. Fails WP:BIO and WP:V. Nsk92 (talk) 00:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Because the article does not include citations from reliable sources, it does not appear to be in compliance with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 19:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.