Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shachiku

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Addhoc (talk) 19:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Shachiku

Shachiku (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Japanese neologism. No indication whatsoever that the term found its way into the English language. Delete. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 14:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete as per nom. Does this count as a WP:DICTDEF? — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 15:11, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • No references provided to show the word is in use. The top few Google hits are not obviously relevant. Delete unless references are added. --DanielRigal (talk) 15:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless someone can add more info on where it came from and why it's notable. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 16:26, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete – Actually have found the word with an explanation of the meaning as shown here; [1]. But that is the problem…it is only a word that would be more suited to Wikitionary, and even here I would question its inclusion, than Wikipedia. Shoessss |  Chat  18:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Contra nom, a word's being in the English language or not has nothing to do with notability. However, this word itself doesn't seem to be worth an article, and I don't see any evidence that it could be expanded beyond a dictionary definition. The jawiki page ja:社畜 is just as bad as this one, and Google search in Japanese shows plenty of hits [2], but no actual coverage jumps out at the eye. All this suggests it's a concept that would be better covered as part of an article at a descriptive title like Corporate culture in Japan or something. cab (talk) 19:07, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete wikipedia is not a dictionary. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 00:04, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. —Fg2 (talk) 00:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Transwiki to Wiktionary. No use just tossing out a perfectly good dicdef when it can just be moved to the correct site. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.