Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sgtbash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 02:28, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sgtbash

Tagged as patent nonsense but plainly isn't. Since A7 doesn't apply to robots (!) we'll have to delete it as non-notable robotcruft. -Splash^talk 00:46, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom --Rogerd 02:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or possibly userfy to User:Sgtbash, the author (who has no other edits). No claim to notability. --A D Monroe III 02:30, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Everything in this article is already covered, better and in far more detail, in Robot Wars. The latter also tells us the correct spelling of Sergeant Bash's name. This appears to be a mis-placed user page. If Sgtbash (talk · contribs) had made any contributions to Wikipedia at all, my opinion would be "userfy". But xe hasn't. Delete. Uncle G 03:44, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Robot Wars has better coverage of this and other robots. Andrew pmk | Talk 17:32, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Reasons already given by other voters. Bushytails 05:59, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.