Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SfB

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Rx StrangeLove 19:09, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SfB

WP:ISNOT an indiscriminate collection of raw information. I'm not quite sure what these codes mean, but the way they're just dumped right in tells me this article is unsalvageable. DS 13:28, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

• speedy as having no context. It seems to be some building code, but who can tell? — brighterorange (talk) 13:43, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• delete. This looks to me like the table of contents for a refernce on building codes. If there was actual content and the copyright status was ok I'd say transwiki to wikibooks. However as there is no content and the copyright is therefore irelevant (afaiu in the USA you cannot copy just a table contents, but ianal) there is nothing to transwiki. Thryduulf 14:09, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy. These are UK building codes. -- RHaworth 14:19, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• See UniClass and ISO 13567 for an explanation of what these are. Uncle G 18:47, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as lacking context and possibly copyvio. Andrew pmk | Talk 23:21, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.