Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SezamPro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It wouldn't hurt to delete this, considering it's only a sentence, and someone else (who knows Serbian) can rewrite with sources. Sr13 22:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SezamPro

SezamPro (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:CORP. There are no references given or that I can find to support SezamPro is notable. Nv8200p talk 00:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

  • delete - obviously there's nothing to say about it, save what and where it is. So, keeping it seems pointless. Kripto 00:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Notability not established nor even really asserted, no references in secondary sources.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 02:18, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above.OysterGuitarst 03:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete No indication of notability, nothing showing that it passes WP:CORP, no sources. Indeed could be speedy deleted under WP:CSD#A7 (no assertion of importance). DES (talk) 05:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per nom. Thruppence 14:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. SezamPro is one of biggest Serbian internet providers. Sources (all Serbian though) can be found e.g. from Ekonomist magazine, PC press, PC press (well, disclaimer: PC press is the original founder or the sister magazine of SezamPro, and Dejan Ristanović owns/manages both, but nevertheless...). It even has a few Scholar hits (subtract the ones containing @sezampro.co.yu). That being said, no, I'm not inclined to expand the article as I find the topic boring :-), so I'm indifferent with the destiny of the current sub-sub-stub. Duja► 10:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
    ...also, here and here. Duja► 11:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.