Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seyhan Kurt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Yanksox 12:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Seyhan Kurt

• Listed as as speedy delete by User:Jachin but I don't think it qualifies as it list several books he wrote. All the links on google I found were not in English though so I can't add anthing or even verify the content. Rmhermen 21:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

French Wikipedia has an article on him. Rmhermen 21:18, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, but about the same as the English one.Chaser (T) 07:11, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• The page on me is being deleted because i don't have any books. This guy does. Kevin Doran 21:36, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Very weak delete, but only because of the verifiability issues. If proper references are found and added, I'll change to keep. Stifle (talk) 21:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

This AfD from 20 May 2006 is being relisted to achieve greater consensus -- Samir धर्म 02:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep The article is only less than a week old, tag it for verifiaction, and if no sources are found in a reasonble time, come back here. I noticed no one asked the author of the piece for sources, shouldn't that be the first option? Regards, MartinRe 11:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Update: Have notified the author of the deletion debate, with a request for sources. Regards, MartinRe 11:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep It's been on fr.wiki for over a week [1] and they don't seem to have a problem with it. He gets some Ghits on Turkish sites that seem to confirm the books. Dlyons493 Talk 13:11, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep meets WP:BIO as published author as Googling confirms. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep rather quick on the trigger with the nom, I think. How's about at least leaving verification request for a week or two first, as the article reads as if it should be kept. Needs cleanup though. Tyrenius 15:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.