Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexuality and Christian Art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:52, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sexuality and Christian Art

Article barely touched for some time, nothing was there except original research and rampant speculation. I'm not sure there ever could be much content here except criticism of Christian sexual ethics which belong in other articles. -- Jbamb 01:45, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as original research. This article doesn't actually discuss sexuality in Christian art at all. Feezo (Talk) 02:10, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is an essay that presents original research. Bobby1011 02:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• D per nom the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 03:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• delete per nom Henning Makholm 03:05, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research, we are an encyclopedia. Essays are original research. --Terence Ong 05:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Hyphen5 06:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above, original research --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 07:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - As nom. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 20:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 04:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:27, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all. Original research. ProhibitOnions 20:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Triage 22:01, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.