Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual exhaustion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 12:08, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sexual exhaustion

A combination of original research and nonsense (eye floaters???) Tyhopho 14:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Type sexual exhaustion to google and see there is no reason to delete this important topic. It will take time to expand it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yinyangparantaja (talk • contribs)

• Comment Floaters are real, but whether they ever have any connection to "sexual exhaustion" I have no idea. Шизомби 14:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC) The article seems to be a combination of pseudoscience and religious teachings about sex. WP doesn't bar such things necessarily, but if that is all the article is going to contain, it needs to be much clearer about who makes these claims with references. Шизомби 14:28, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. The term seems notable [1] but the article lacks sources. PJM 14:12, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This reminds me of Gen. Jack D. Ripper's crazy speech on "purity of essence" from Dr. Strangelove. It's interesting to note that Latin has words for this concept, defutatus or ecfutatus, but that's really irrelevant. The belief that sex saps your energy force or essence is really bordering on schizophrenic paranoia and is clearly crankery. Brian G. Crawford 16:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
  • "Candy/Is dandy/But sex/doesn't rot your teeth." Samizdat graffiti popular around a university I attended in the sixties... Dpbsmith (talk) 00:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete without prejudice pending sources. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 18:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. CalJW 22:32, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable. One of the two "references" provided is merely an online forum. The other is a website that does not seem to me to come close to meeting the guidelines for reliable sources; Intelihealth it ain't. "Eye floaters" seems like a joke to me. It is certainly an indication of unreliable information. Floaters are due to physical imperfections in the vitreous and you will note that our article on them does not mention any connection with sexual activity. I think most people know these days that masturbation does not make you go blind but maybe it is still possible to convince the gullible that it causes floaters. (It does grow hair on the palms of your hands, of course). Dpbsmith (talk) 00:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOR. Danny Lilithborne 04:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Merecat 06:12, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Total nonsense. Probably half of it is made up! Freddie 01:23, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.