Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex Bunny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sex Bunny

Should be deleted because it has no noticable basis in fact. If it did, however, it wouldn't require its own page

• Delete, although knowing TISM, it may well have a basis in fact (the kind of facts the band deals in). That doesn't exactly make it notable, though. BigHaz 10:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not worth its own page. (Maybe redirect to the song/video page, maybe not). TheronJ 13:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Vanishingly obscure (NN). Rohirok 16:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per CSD-A7 and WP:FICT. I wouldn't mind redirecting, though, if this is a plausible search term. I'm not really sure it is. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 18:01, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: ....--Realoser 01:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Much as I like TISM's stuff, I don't recall the song having much impact on the charts and the main character in a flash animation is pretty obscure. Capitalistroadster 03:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn and unverifiable. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 04:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. --Roisterer 12:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not worth its own page unless text is expanded and citations are provided. --Richard 06:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.