Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sewcom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sewcom

Reads like an advert for the subject. It was initially marked for speedy back in March, but the admin suggested that "This should probably be a VfD not a speedy." Akamad ^{Happy new year!} 00:41, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete quickly, obvious advert for non-notable (company?). :( that it was changed to cleanup instead of vfd. --Quarl 00:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- advertising. NN. — ERcheck @ 01:14, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete lol teachers and students do often use search engines to locate information on the Web O RLY? - FrancisTyers 01:28, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. — MATHWIZ2020 ^{TALK | CONTRIBS} 01:43, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Original research, NN. -- ReyBrujo 02:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. -- NeoJustin 04:43, December 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- This is probably copyrighted material somewhere. TheRingess 04:46, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this appears to be advertising.--MONGO 09:27, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete This article is not notable and does not contain original research. Ajwebb 18:03, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.