Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Oaks Dam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep per overwhelming consensus. Dams are major public works. FCYTravis 23:04, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Seven Oaks Dam

Delete I propose deleting this article. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a Dam geek's reference book. --Choesarian 17:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep - major public works projects are highly notable. Is this vote for deletion done in good faith? --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:26, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Kappa 20:24, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep All of these dam articles are either informative, or workable stubs. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 20:39, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• KEEP. It seems that someone doesn't like dams. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.195.142.210 (talk • contribs)
• Keep all the dam articles, or give a better dam reason why they should be deleted! --MisterHand 20:54, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep all major public works projects.Gateman1997 20:57, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep dam it, Jim! Flyboy Will 20:59, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Gateman1997. -- JJay 21:24, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.