Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Settibalija

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. W.marsh 21:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Settibalija

Settibalija (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

not notable, lack of sources Chris! _ct 02:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep It's an Indian Caste, one of the lower ones apparently. An entire tribe of people is inherently notable. [1], [2]. Although I admit it will be difficult doing this properly without foreign language assistance. -- Horrorshowj 06:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - The topic meets the general notability guidelines.. Google books and Google scholar have some hits. In addition, here is some reliable source material:
  • The Hindu (June 15, 2002) 4 more castes included in OBC list.
  • The Hindu (June 16, 2003) Gouda-Settibalijas seek major share of BC seats for polls.
  • The Hindu (February 7, 2004) Gouda, Settibalija conference.
  • Rao, R.Jagadeeswara. (March 5, 2004) The Hindu Election Dhamaka: Where election results are trend-setting.
  • The Hindu (March 23, 2004) "Rice bowl" voters may tilt the scales.

-- Jreferee t/c 19:25, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep per above. Ichormosquito 19:56, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.