Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Cluett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Userfy and delete redirect. - Bobet 18:30, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Seth Cluett

Vanity page. Recommend userfy and delete. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 03:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Delete vanity page --Xrblsnggt 04:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete and userfy per nom. Ryulong 04:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as working artist. — Reinyday, 04:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • You do realize that the main author to the article's username is the same as the person the article is about, don't you? Ryulong 05:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy and delete as vanity. Not otherwise notable. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 06:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy+Delete and inform user of the situation. Written as vanity using the word 'my' when referring to subjects work.--Andeh 09:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - and I am not even sure if it should be userfied, Wikipedia is not a personal webpage. --Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 14:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BIO -- Alias Flood 16:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete There are 500+ ghits for this name, but half of them appear to be reviews that "Seth Cluett" has writen on Amazon.com (for example) DavidHumphreys ^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT _{THE THINGS I MESSED UP}18:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:BIO ;) Computerjoe's talk 18:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and Userfy per above

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.