Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergeant Fox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sergeant Fox

Sergeant Fox (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article makes no assertion of real-world notability (being on one writer's list of 10 cool clones hardly counts). The article is entirely in-universe plot summary; the lack of reliable sources makes it impossible for it to pass WP:WAF. --EEMeltonIV 04:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep Sergeant Fox=awesome=notable. Bobsbasement 04:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable, cruft. Keb25 05:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Lacks any real secondary sources and isn't notable in anyway; if we allow this character we might as well allow every single character from every fiction piece to have their own biography.
    Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 05:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete in universe cruftJJJ999 06:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This is comparable to how Wikipedia used to have articles on every single Pokemon. This is the very definition of fancruft. At the very least, this should be redirected to a more appropriate article. Life, Liberty, Property 06:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable figure, doesn't deserve its own article. ~ Sebi [talk] 08:31, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect/merge. Isn't there a list of clonetroopers this could be merged into? Based on the Wookieepedia article, he certainly seems a relatively important clonetrooper. --Gwern (contribs) 17:55 15 October 2007 (GMT)
  • Answer - The list of clone troopers and the list of clone trooper commanders were deleted as unsourced and non-notable. --EEMeltonIV 17:59, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.