Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seomra Spraoi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 18:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Seomra Spraoi

Seomra Spraoi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Appears to be nothing more than a set of meeting rooms and area. Only open less than three weeks, this just isn't notable on any ground of measurement. Ben W Bell talk 11:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Like there aren't any other conference centers in the world. If they suddenly moved, say, a big, huge, spectular, and notable convention there, then it could be kept, but this one goes in the big trash can on the server. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 11:40, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Fails notability guidelines. This social space is less than three weeks old and there is nothing in this article which is worthy of notice. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 13:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I think that it is has been open for a few months now. They got one media mention at least. Some of the groups that meet there might be notable, but at the moment the place itself is not. Bláthnaid 17:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. It's been open a couple of years now, it moved to its current address a few months ago. Three weeks ago was the official opening. For a space that's non-notable it has a lot of Google hits [1]. "Conference center" is missing the point somewhat. Lapsed Pacifist 12:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Comment I see, I only became aware of it when it moved. I'm sympathetic to the project, but looking through Google I can't find anything that makes it notable for Wikipedia, or provides WP:RS. Bláthnaid 13:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Link: Here you go. Lapsed Pacifist 14:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Comment - any chance of a copy of the article that doesn't require a paying account so the rest can have a look? Ben W Bell talk 22:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

• Changing to keep: The Irish Times article and RTE interview are enough to make it notable. Thanks, Lapsed Pacifist. Bláthnaid 18:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, seems to be much more than a community centre. Really needs expanded and improved, but there seems to be plenty of reliable sources to do that. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 08:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.