Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensitive Pornograph
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Robert T | @ | C 00:23, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Sensitive Pornograph
delete unless someone's willing to rewrite --Trovatore 06:08, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, presumably real anime, AFD is not cleanup. Kappa 06:15, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment my view is that very badly written articles should be deleted unless someone shows a willingness to rewrite. If someone wants to write a good article later, nothing prevents it. --Trovatore 06:28, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- An AFD takes up more editors' time than fixing it would. Kappa 06:42, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment my view is that very badly written articles should be deleted unless someone shows a willingness to rewrite. If someone wants to write a good article later, nothing prevents it. --Trovatore 06:28, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- delete Author has not demonstrated notability of this anime. Dxco 06:15, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. This nomination is a mystery to me; this article is a rough description and a plot summary, not bad for an hour-old stub. What's the problem with this? - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 07:14, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. the notability of an anime or the poor quality of the article shouldn't influence its existence. tag it for cleanup or expansion and leave it to be the seed of some other wikipedian's working TastemyHouse 07:18, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Needs to be improved Prashanthns 10:04, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- keep why does it need to be rewritten so it is not erased that does not even make sense Yuckfoo 19:17, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per Kappa. Cookiecaper 20:40, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unless verified, no cited sources and doesn't google. Radiant_>|< 00:49, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per Kappa. Trollderella 00:52, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Anything with the word porno in it is notable and worth keeping. —Brim 06:50, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete fancruft, no evidence of notability. Wile E. Heresiarch 07:17, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, it's a whole work, so I'm not sure how it's fancruft. What kind of claim of notability would you be looking for? - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 22:06, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
