Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was transwiki and delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 03:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sensel

Sensel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unsourced non-notable alternative terminology does not need an article of its own; the term could instead by added as an alterantive (assuming a source is available) on the pixel page that discusses this meaning. Dicklyon (talk) 17:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete-this sounds like a dictionary definition. Wikipedia is not a dictionary.TrUCo⁹31¹ 18:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. Cheers, LAX 21:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wiktionary, should be OK there.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.