Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senior Cambridge

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 3 July 2005 13:58 (UTC)

[edit] Senior Cambridge

Dictdef. --W(t) 07:22, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC)

• Delete. Nonsense. There is no such thing as Twelfth Grade in public schools let alone calling it Senior Cambridge. -- RHaworth 08:01, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC)
• Delete It may not be nonsense, since we don't know the full context. Of course, unless it is dramatically expanded, it is still worthy of deletion. Sonic Mew 09:13, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
• A pathetic stub that mainly contains incidental information and not much about the topic itself. Weak Keep. Uncle G 11:50, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC)
• Keep. Senior Cambridge exams appear to be genuine[1]. Page needs more work, though. Pburka 14:54, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, thanks Uncle G. Kappa 21:23, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep notable examinations. Capitalistroadster 01:43, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Still very confusing, needs a lot of cleanup. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 04:38, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete better to rewrite this from scratch. JamesBurns 06:35, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • This sort of cavalier approach to embryonic articles is really not helpful. The vast majority of people are surely more likely to work on an existing article than to start a new one. Keep. CalJW 19:00, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A dicdef, three bits of trivia, and a whole mess of cited sources. If that many sources can't produce an article, then the subject probably doesn't need an article. --Carnildo 06:53, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • It simply isn't a "dicdef". If all the articles that aren't satisfactory yet or easy to write in one go aren't needed, why do any of us bother? CalJW 19:00, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Article appears to be progressing very well, thanks UncleG. Perhaps there should be a Merge of all the Cambridge exams to one article, leaving this, Junior Cambridge, and Preliminary Cambridge as redirects. I don't yet see the differentiation that would be expected for them to have separate articles, however, I clearly see the use of at least one article for all. Unfocused 04:46, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep based on current revision. Seems to just be an Indian/etc. equivalent to the SAT, and it's used in some major countries, so I'll call it notable. --Idont Havaname 23:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Cleanup Ugly, but keepworthy. The Literate Engineer 07:34, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.