Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senator-elect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirected to United States Senate#Members and elections. El_C 19:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Senator-elect

Senator-elect (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not really new information. The 2006 list is out-of-date. What's the point? The information about their rights/powers/franking/etc. can be merged to United States Senate#Members and elections.—Markles 21:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect per nom - I dont see any need for a term like this Corpx 02:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per nom, --CapitalR 14:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to Senate. List will constantly be out of date. CaveatLector^Talk 22:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to United States Senate#Members and elections, per nom. Redundant. Bullzeye^{Complaint Dept./Contribs)} 23:53, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: I would suggest against a redirect directly to the US Senate on the ground that this term can possibly be used to refer to members-elect of other senatorial bodies. CaveatLector^Talk 15:56, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: I agree with CaveatLector. Change my nomination above to: redirect to Senate.—Markles 18:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect per Bullzeye. Bearian 22:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect Mandsford 00:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.