Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selenia Aspide

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to AIM-7 Sparrow. --Titoxd(?!? - help us) 21:08, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Selenia Aspide

From WP:PNT, been there since December 1st. Discussion from WP:PNT follows... Jamie 00:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

I don't know what language this is in. Seano1 06:25, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
It's Italian. Muriel R 14:54, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
"Missile A-A Air to Air (air air) employed from the F 104 S then modernizes you subsequently to standard ASA and then ASAM. Characterized from a guidance system of the type typical seed-assets of similar systems which Sky Flash and Sparrow (of which the viper it turns out to be a produced copy) can come employed is like missile air air that like missile earth air. In fact the Viper is the base of the system missile of national aerial defense."
  • redirect to "AIM-7 Sparrow". The Selenia Aspide is an upgrade of this missile "Improved versions of the AIM-7 were developed in the 1970s in an attempt to address the weapon's limitations. The AIM-7F, which entered service in 1976, had a dual-stage rocket motor for longer range, solid-state electronics for greatly improved reliability, and a larger warhead. Even this version had room for improvement, leading British Aerospace and the Italian firm Selenia to develop advanced versions of Sparrow with better performance and improved electronics as the Skyflash and SELENIA ASPIDE (caps mine), respectively"

Jcuk

  • Delete: It's a discussion of something at a wholly illogical title, and the article appears to be a discussion of an upgrade to missiles. I'm not sure how many of our readers actually have A-A missiles that they need to upgrade, but I hope they'll be able to get the information some other way. Geogre 18:55, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Jcuk. Redirects are cheap... Jamie 04:26, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.