Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seizo Suzuki
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep; nomination withdrawn and concerns expressed by only delete-voting editor have been addressed. Non-admin close. Jfire (talk) 02:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Seizo Suzuki
Contested WP:PROD, doesn't look like it passes notability to me. Questionable notability tag's been up since April. Wizardman 20:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC) ...and look how easy that was to fix up. Nom withdrawn. Wizardman 00:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Uh, yeah...I was thinking about buying one of his roses...should have noticed this before. All's well that ends well, as the noted rosarian Professor Calculus says in Red Rackham's Treasure. Novickas (talk) 01:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. No improvements to the article since the initial stub a year ago. No references or assertions of notability. Fails WP:BIO. —BradV 21:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep—There is some indication of this person's notability.[1] The French and Japanese articles have more information, so perhaps a translation request would help?—RJH (talk) 21:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - have added some refs. Novickas (talk) 22:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:49, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Refs now in article show notability to me.--Fabrictramp (talk) 22:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. What's arlready done sufficiently demonstrates notability. A translation request on the Japanese article would definitely be in order. —Quasirandom (talk) 23:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 01:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
