Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sedlescombe F.C.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 08:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sedlescombe F.C.

Sedlescombe F.C. (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The lack of notability is a concern here. The club lies in level 12 of the English football pyramid. Siva1979^{Talk to me} 07:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete. If level 12 then 'not notable'. Article also "does not assert the importance or significance of its subject". --Malcolmxl5 10:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete A very sloppy article. If it's in 12th level, it's not notable. Shalom ^Hello 02:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 07:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Does not appear to be notable. Number 57 08:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - as per nom, and, I wish it was possible to use as a reason just the plain awful nature of the article itself. - fchd 19:50, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Seems to be simply a copy and paste from a club article, and is non notable anyway. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 20:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - per nom, also suspect vanity-based article. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.