The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE —Whouk (talk) 08:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Disputed vanity-style page gets an AfD. 38 Google results for this person, and no assertion of notability is present in the article. Nor are there any non-primary sources. (Delete) -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 23:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Speedy delete as A7 (Unremarkable people or groups/Vanity Pages). The only assertion of significance is he won some kind of literature prize in high school and he has diverse clients? Good grief, I deserve an article then. BigDT 01:12, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.