Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Security breaches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:42, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Security breaches

Delete; long, rambling, unencyclopedic original research and personal POV essay about matters covered in other articles on computer security. Features section headings like "Thanks California" and "Thanks USA" (author congratulating jurisdictions for legislation) and many sentences where author quotes and/or refers to himself in the third person ("The largest computer disaster of which AlMac is aware, in terms of amount of money at stake, prior to Y2K, was when the US Federal Reserve ran out of #s for issuing Bonds to finance the national debt.") Normally I would suggest or attempt cleanup but this is just a complete mess, and more importantly from an AfD point of view, is duplicated elsewhere. MCB 22:43, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete -- rambling and unreadable mess. Position paper. Haikupoet 02:04, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - some sort of outline and I can sense a thin smell of a conspiracy theory. Some material is good though. Renata3 05:14, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unencyclopaedic rambling. The subjects of computer security and identity theft are already well covered. [[User:Just zis Guy, you know?|]] 08:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, I informed User:Almac of the article's problems at the end of June and nearly 5 months later, they still haven't been addressed. No prejudice against recreation if a proper article can be written at security breech. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:04, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Rossami 02:44, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.