Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secretard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 03:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Secretard

Secretard (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This article should be either deleted or if the criteria of inclusion of wikitionary are met transwikified. Esurnir 12:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong delete, borderline speedy G1 per WP:NEO - unsourced neologism. (A random blog doesn't count as a "source.") YechielMan 13:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete- Agree with YechielMan. -wizzard2k (C•T•D) 18:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete also borderline G10. --Whsitchy 21:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Why delete? A simple dictionary definition would be just a sentence, while this describes it in much more detail. Also, what makes you think a "random blog" is a bad source? -Thepsychoone — Thepsychoone (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 23:13, May 27, 2007 (UTC).
  • First, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Just because its a detailed definition doesn't make it less of a definition. What would make it not a definition are multiple citations to published content about the subject, but with something like this, that's going to be rare. Second, blogs are not generally considered reliable sources here. Anyone can publish a blog which makes verifying difficult. -wizzard2k (C•T•D) 06:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete per nom. Thepsychoone should check the guidelines regarding sources definitions. Adrian M. H. 18:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - WP:NEO -- Whpq 18:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.