The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:35, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
far too minor a character to warrant his own article Dunstantalk 16:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete per my nom. --Dunstantalk 16:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- Kicking222 17:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete He's so minor he doesn't even have a name. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 17:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom -- zzuuzz(talk) 21:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Heh. Delete, per nom. — TheKMantalk 22:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.