Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebacean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:53, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sebacean

Sebacean (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article about a fictional race has lots of plot summary but no sources demonstrating notability. --Gavin Collins 08:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction & fantasy deletions. --Gavin Collins 08:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
• comment: I see that you still don't want to listen to those who are trying to work with you (still tagging pages without looking at them and still sending articles to afd).

Other editors please see Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Gavin.collins and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eidelon. And User:SolidPlaid, I find that you are a good deletionist, but your idea that people should be "encouraged" to improve articles via Afd is still wrong. I also found out that you are now manipulating Chunky rice to improve the article for you (specifically: I want more where that came from). Pat yourself on the back for wasting an admin's time.--Lenticel ^(talk) 12:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete as fails WP:FICTION. We are not in the business of cataloging fiction (plot elements, summaries, or otherwise). Zero "real-world context" as mandated by WP:FICTION. Also, I note my extreme distaste for comments by Lenticel; they are neither appropriate nor productive. /Blaxthos 17:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  • I agree. And those comments are also out of place... what does SolidPlaid have to do with this article or afd? Is User:Lenticel just abusing afd discussions by posting off-topic complaints? Crazysuit 01:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I'm thinking he's going into the rescue again and you're right I'll address my concerns on his talk page rather than here. (I'm still working on my own overzealousness too). I just want to tell other editors on what is happening. If this Afd was made in another time, without the controversy, I'll side with Gavin myself and vote merge or even a redirect to the Peacekeeper wars. --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No real world notability. Crazysuit 01:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Rray 20:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Farscape, I guess. It's a likely search term, and the top google hit for "sebacean". PC78 20:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No sources to establish notability or provide real world context. Jay32183 23:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.