Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seastrunk

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:58, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Seastrunk

Requesting deletion, because Wikipedia is not a general knowledge base (genealogical entries) --Eponymous Coward 08:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as I fail to see exactly what the point of the article is. It seems to have been quoted verbatim from a geneology site somewhere. --Jamyskis 09:16, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Barfooz 09:25, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Jamyskis is right: see http://www.seastrunk.com/seastrunk_history.htm Daniel 12:09, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Well, then, it's a copyvio, and copyright violation procedures should have been followed. RickK 04:35, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
    • Done now. See WP:CP#May 14. Daniel 13:06, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. EvilPhoenix
• Delete until I see something in the temporary subpage →Iñgōlemo← ^talk 05:02, 2005 May 18 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NOT. Radiant_* 10:12, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.