Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean woodward
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result wasdelete -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sean woodward
As a writer, he seems to have limited and only local notability. The other claims to notability fail WP:BIO. Freshacconci | Talk 19:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- - As an international writer and publisher he is notable for first offering a platform for a number of writers Zoshouse
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —Freshacconci | Talk 19:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Appears to be self-published, and the dragonheartpress website doesn't appear to have any content beyond the front page. The alleged quote from Glyn Hughes, who is notable, is a bit suspicious without a source to give it context. The music, digital art sections are non-notable in themselves, and adding them together doesn't help. Thomjakobsen 19:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- - incorrect, the site was being rebranded and is now online Zoshouse
- - Dragonheart Press is notable for first publishing a number of poets including Alec Rapkin, Poet Laurete of the Peak Zoshouse —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.235.15.116 (talk) 11:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- - awaiting confirmation of quote from Glyn Hughes to post here Zoshouse
- - "adding them together doesn't help" - the person is notable for their "New-Rennaisance" ability to fuse major creative avenues Zoshouse —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.235.15.116 (talk) 11:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment. Perhaps consider adding his non-notable band Gothick, created by the same person (presumably him?), and full of peacock language like "leading" and "seminal" despite being distributed through an occult bookshop and having no third-party coverage? This is a really shoddy self-promo job. Thomjakobsen. 19:38, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- - peacock is an interesting subjective term as is shoddy Zoshouse
-
- This has Copyright 2007 Zos House / T3KTON FOUNDATION and SERVICE CONTACT : (address excised)@seanwoodward.com, suggesting that the music is self-released too. Thomjakobsen 19:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- User:Zoshouse is the creator and editor of both articles. Thomjakobsen 19:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- This has Copyright 2007 Zos House / T3KTON FOUNDATION and SERVICE CONTACT : (address excised)@seanwoodward.com, suggesting that the music is self-released too. Thomjakobsen 19:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. NASCAR Fan24(radio me!) 19:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete also per above. STORMTRACKER 94 20:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete NN and self-published. ILovePlankton(L—S) 20:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, then create redirect to Shaun Woodward, which is a reasonable search alternative. Jdcooper 22:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Burntsauce 22:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - Modernist 23:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per A7 without looking at the article - when the last name is in lowercase, the person is nearly always unnotable Will (talk) 23:08, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as nn, per nom & several above. Not sure about "Will's Law", especially for the Dutch. Johnbod 17:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.