Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Sinjin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. — JIP | Talk 10:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sean Sinjin

History pages (Nov. 14th entries) are incorrect and expose author to serious risk of religious extremist reprisal. Will make new entry (similar to last entry) once this article and history are deleted Galgitron 14:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

  • This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 16:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep the nomination doesn't seem to be a reason to delete. --Pboyd04 16:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Looks like somebody bought a few copies today Amazon: Today: #48,483 in Books Yesterday: #322,217 in Books Dlyons493 Talk 16:42, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
    • It's averaging a rank of around 200,000 Dlyons493 Talk 20:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. -- JJay 23:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete can you think of a better reason for removing an article than to protect someone from harm?
  • Delete per above. -- AnthonyPaulO 21:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Libelous comments are not a reason to delete the article. However, libelous edits (assuming we KNOW that they are libelous) can and will be removed from the page history per Wikipedia:Libel. howcheng {chat} 22:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment: OK, I just walked through the November 14 edits indicated by User:Galgitron, and I really don't see anything libelous in there. There's a little POV pushing and some linkspam, and it was done by an anonymous user whose IP address maps to a German ISP. I don't see how that person is going to be subjected to "religious extremist reprisal." howcheng {chat} 08:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.